<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="../../rss.css"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<!-- vim: se ts=4: -->
<channel>
  <atom:link href="https://bwo.life/org/comm/rss.xml"
  rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

  <title>Biology Worthy of Life: From Molecules of Information to the Wisdom of the Organism</title>
  <description>
  The articles posted on this feed (now only a few per year) have included
  many accessible updates on the technical literature; commentaries on
  that literature; and introductions (with links) to major new articles
  associated with the Biology Worthy of Life project.  The content in
  general has related to the dramatic discoveries re-shaping our
  understanding of organisms, especially in the field of gene regulation.
  However, the focus is now shifting toward evolution, and the meaning of
  organic wholeness.  All, or nearly all, articles now being posted are
  part of an online book titled “Organisms and Their Evolution — Agency
  and Meaning in the Drama of Life” (formerly called “Evolution As It Was
  Meant To Be — And the Living Narratives That Tell Its Story”).  All
  articles, notes, and commentaries are by Stephen L. Talbott of The
  Nature Institute.
  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/news.htm</link>
  <webMaster>stevet@netfuture.org (Stephen L. Talbott)</webMaster>
  <managingEditor>stevet@netfuture.org (Stephen L. Talbott)</managingEditor>
  <category>holistic biology</category>
  <category>whole organism biology</category>
  <category>genetics</category>
  <category>evolution</category>
  <category>epigenetics</category>
  <category>gene regulation></category>
  <category>gene expression></category>
  <category>holism versus mechanism</category>
  <category>meaning in biology and evolution</category>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <ttl>1440</ttl>
  <language>en-us</language>
 
  <item>
    <title>The Evolution of Consciousness</title>
    <description>
     The history of language gives us a reflection of the evolution
     of human consciousness.  It points to a time before we became
     aware of our own existence as distinct Selves observing a world
     “out there” and separate from ourselves.  How accurate
     (or inaccurate) our own experience of a subject-object dualism
     is can be properly assessed only against the background of
     the evolution of consciousness, so far as it can be traced.
     Oddly, though, contemporary evolutionary theory has not had
     much to say about the evolution of consciousness.  This ought to
	 concern us because the evolved character of our own consciousness
	 unavoidably frames and limits our theory of evolution.  The ancients
	 read the “face” of what we think of as the outer world rather as we
	 today can still read the face of another human being — that is, they
	 read material phenomena as expressions of inner being.  Can we learn
	 anything by setting their experience over against our own alienation
	 from the outer world?  This may be the same question as, “Can we
	 overcome the dualistic heritage of the past several centuries?”
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/evolconsc.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/evolconsc.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>epistemology</category>
	<category>evolution/of consciousness</category>
	<category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Inheritance (2): Genetics and the Particulate View of Life</title>
    <description>
     The fundamental pathologies of gene-centered thinking in biology
     arise from the materialist bent of virtually all reputable
     biologists.  This mindset prevents them from acknowledging the
     organizing ideas that constitute whole cells and whole organisms
     as what they are.  It also forces them to attempt to understand
     the organism from the bottom up, starting with genes.  But when they
     do this, they inevitably end up attributing to genes the organizing
     ideas that actually belong to the whole cell and whole organism.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/inherit2.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/inherit2.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>evolution/and development</category>
	<category>evolution/inheritance</category>
	<category>evolution/and mutations</category>
    <category>explanation/part and whole</category>
	<category>gene/mutation</category>
	<category>gene/genocentrism</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Is a Qualitative Science Possible?</title>
    <description>
	 A science that has for centuries forsworn qualities as “merely
	 subjective” must regard the idea of a qualitative science as a
	 contradiction in terms.  Here I offer three examples of current work
	 illustrating what a qualitative science can be — and how essential it
	 is to any genuine knowledge of the world.  This is extremely
	 problematic for an evolutionary theory that has no means for
	 addressing observed qualitative patterns running through taxonomic
	 groups.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/qualsci.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/qualsci.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>evolution/as mindless process</category>
	<category>form/organismal</category>
	<category>holism/as polarity</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Inheritance (1): The Whole Organism</title>
    <description>
	 We know organisms only as wonderfully integrated wholes, and we know
	 inheritance only as an inheritance of whole cells.  This truth was
	 obscured during the era of genes and molecular biology, when
	 biologists came to see genes as substitutes for cells and organisms.
	 But the consequence of this was that biologists lost sight of the
	 central problem of inheritance — how an organism’s unified character
	 and entire way of being are passed on to its offspring.  We will need
	 to recover our sight of that problem before we can make fundamental
	 progress in understanding evolution.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/inherit1.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/inherit1.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>evolution/and development</category>
	<category>evolution/inheritance</category>
	<category>evolution/and mutations</category>
	<category>gene/as difference-maker</category>
	<category>holism</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Toward a Thought-Full Teleology</title>
    <description>
	 We cannot explain the purposiveness of organisms by referring to
	 natural selection or cybernetic devices. We must reckon with the
	 organism’s interiority, which includes the play of thinking through
	 the organism, whether consciously or unconsciously. In humans, our
	 conscious intentions are seamlessly continuous with the unconscious
	 realization of those intentions at the cellular (including genomic)
	 level. All our physiological processes are inherently purposive
	 whether consciously or otherwise
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/news/linnean/talk_notes.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/news/linnean/talk_notes.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Development Writ Large</title>
    <description>
	 The question of the directiveness of evolution turns out to be
	 almost trivially simple, with an unproblematic answer: evolutionary
	 “development” must be at least as directive (purposive in an
	 organic sense, or “telos-realizing”) as the development of an
	 individual organism.  Unfortunately, however, evolutionary
	 biologists have bypassed this conclusion because they are
	 rigorously trained to ignore in their theoretical work what they
	 know very well in their direct acquaintance with organisms.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/devo_l.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/devo_l.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>development (ontogeny)</category>
	<category>evolution</category>
	<category>evolution/and development</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Puzzles of the Microworld</title>
    <description>
	 The world of the cell and its molecules is so different from what we
	 can readily picture to ourselves that it remains virtually unknown to
	 us.  It is a real question whether we can speak at all of “things” at
	 that scale, as opposed to forces or potentials.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/microworld.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/microworld.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>machine-idea</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>How Our Genes Come to Expression (It Takes an Epigenetic
	Village)</title>
    <description>
     Given the modern-day, almost fetish-like preoccupaton with
	 genes, it is a remarkable fact that almost no one in our society
	 is aware of the dramatic story about how our genes enter into our
	 lives.  Here is presented an overview of that story.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/epigene2.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/epigene2.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>chromosome/chromatin</category>
	<category>holism</category>
	<category>plasticity/genome</category>
	<category>transcription</category>
	<category>transcription/transcription factors</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Teleology and Evolution: Why Can’t We Have ‘Evolution on
	Purpose’?</title>
    <description>
	 Biologists reject the idea of teleology, or purposiveness,
	 in evolution because they have refused to acknowledge it
	 theoretically even where they cannot help recognizing it in
	 practice — namely in the development of individual organisms.
	 Mice embryos consistently coordinate all their growth and
	 activity along a path toward adulthood.  Attempts to explain
	 this purposively directed development by appealing to natural
	 selection are blatantly circular, while also importing human
	 purposiveness “under the table” through the appeal to machine
	 models in biology.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/evotelos.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/evotelos.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>development (ontogeny)</category>
	<category>evolution/and development</category>
	<category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
	<category>machine-idea</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>Why We Cannot Explain the Form of Organisms</title>
    <description>
	 Is the form of an organism something that needs to be explained? Or
	 does our our subtle tracing of biological form and transformation
	 already give us the explanation and understanding we seek — because
	 through this tracing we apprehend the thinking that is the
	 intelligible principle of the organism’s form?
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/form2.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/form2.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>development (ontogeny)</category>
	<category>form</category>
	<category>holism</category>
	<category>machine-idea</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>What Is the Problem of Form?</title>
    <description>
	 How does the yet-unrealized form of a mature animal become the ‘goal’
	 of the animal’s embryological development? How can we understand
	 future-directed causation and top-down causation in biology?
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/form1.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/form1.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>development (ontogeny)</category>
	<category>form</category>
	<category>holism</category>
	<category>machine-idea</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>All Science Must Be Rooted in Experience</title>
    <description>
	 All science is experienced-based.  We have a conflicted attitude
	 toward this truth, believing as we do that science must be empirical
	 (based on experience), while at the same time we denigrate experience
	 as merely subjective.  Freeing ourselves from this contradiction is a
	 radical step, and delivers biology from the bonds of materialism and
	 reductionism.  We also realize that experience gives us the real
	 world because the real world is, by nature, ‘made of experience’.
    </description>
    <link>https://bwo.life/bk/epist1.htm</link>
    <guid>https://bwo.life/bk/epist1.htm</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>explanation</category>
	<category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
    <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item>
    <title>The Keys To This Book</title>
    <description>
	 There are three central themes in the book, “Organisms and
	 Their Evolution — Agency and Meaning in the Drama of Life”:
	 1) every organism possesses a narrative agency and does not
	 consist merely of chemical interactions; 2) every animal’s
	 life narrative is an outward expression of interior meaning;
	 and 3) biologists suffer from a kind of blindsight through
	 which they are unable to incorporate much of what they actually
	 know about organisms into their scientific explanations.
	 The book also rests on a fundamental conviction that the world,
	 by nature, manifests itself in thought.
	</description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/keys.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/keys.htm</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019
	  14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>explanation/biological</category>
	<category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Evolution Writ Small</title> <description> When we look at
	organic development, we see powers of directed change in the only
	place where they ever appear — in living organisms.  These powers can
	hardly be irrelevant to evolution.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/evo_s.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/evo_s.htm</guid> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019
	14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>development</category>
	<category>evolution/and development</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>A Mess of Causes</title> <description> Causes and effects
	are never neatly separable in organisms. Over and above physical
	causation, we discover a story-like coordination of causes.
	Biologists widely recognize this, but nevertheless try to describe
	biological processes as if they were nothing but a succession of
	physical causes and effects.  The resulting descriptions are highly
	self-contradictory.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/cause.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/cause.htm</guid> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019
	14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>explanation/and causation</category>
	<category>holism/contextual</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Our Bodies Are Formed Streams</title> <description> In
	living beings, structure arises from movement, not the other way
	around.  Movement and transformation are primary.  This is
	particularly evident in recent discoveries about the functioning of
	disordered proteins and about the importance of phase transitions in
	the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/stream.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/stream.htm</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019
	14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>holism</category>
	<category>protein/disordered</category>
	<category>form/molecular</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Let’s Not Begin With Natural Selection</title>
	<description> The key ideas of natural selection are commonly
	presented in the form of a core logic, or algorithm, that leads, with
	absolute certainty, to meaningful evolution. In reality, this logic is
	empty, and all the meaning depends upon what organism-agents actually
	do.  By itself, the logic of natural selection does not tell us
	whether there will be any evolutionary change at all.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/ns1.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/ns1.htm</guid> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019
	14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>evolution</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>The Mystery of an Unexpected Coherence</title>
	<description> RNA splicing and, in some organisms, the reconstruction
	of shattered genomes (and, in all organisms, the processes of DNA
	damage repair) illustrate the coherent, holistic, end-directed,
	epigenetic performance of living narratives.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/coherence.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/coherence.htm</guid> <pubDate>Sun, 19 May
	2019 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>epigenetics</category>
	<category>gene regulation</category>
	<category>holism/contextual</category> <category>RNA</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Context: Dare We Call It Holism?</title> <description>
	Every organism, and indeed every significant biological entity from a
	cell on up, is a governing context that informs and disciplines its
	own parts, while also participating in larger contexts; and the
	governance is established by the interwoven ideas that make the
	context what it is.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/context.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/context.htm</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019
	14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>explanation/part and whole</category>
	<category>holism/contextual</category> <category>inwardness
	(intention, idea, meaning)</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>The Sensitive, Muscular Cell</title> <description> The
	cytoskeleton and cellular membranes illustrate both the integral unity
	of the cell and also the temptation to isolate parts in our thought as
	‘controlling’ causes. In reality, we discover in every cell the power
	of the whole to express itself through its parts.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/cell.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/cell.htm</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019
	14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>explanation/and causation</category>
	<category>holism</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>What Brings Our Genome Alive?</title> <description> The
	idea of DNA as an informational sequence encoding a genetic program is
	giving way to a much more dynamic idea involving three-dimensional
	chromosomes that actively gesture their meanings </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/genes.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/genes.htm</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019
	14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>chromosome/dynamics</category>
	<category>chromosome/in 3D space</category> <category>gene
	regulation</category> <category>genome/organization</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>The Organism’s Story</title> <description> The fact of
	purposive activity — the obvious play of active agency, the
	coordination of means toward the realization of relatively stable
	ends, and the undeniable evidence that animals perceive a world and
	interpret their perceptions according to their own way of life — we
	can sum up all this by saying that every organism is narrating a
	meaningful life story.  This is not something that a rock, say,
	loosened by ice and tumbling down the steep slope of a mountain
	ravine, does in anything like the same manner.  The pattern of
	physical events in the organism is raised by its peculiar sort of
	coherence toward something like a biography whose “logic” unfolds on
	an entirely different level from the logic of inanimate physical
	causation. When we tell a story, the narrative threads convey meanings
	— for example, motives, needs, and intentions — and these are never a
	matter of mere physical cause and consequence.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/bk/story_36.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/bk/story_36.htm</guid> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan
	2019 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>explanation/biological</category> <category>explanation/part
	and whole</category> <category>holism/contextual</category>
	<category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Scenes of Life</title> <description> We in the
	twenty-first century have inherited a rich and extensive library of
	descriptive literature about living things, their habitats, and their
	mutual relations, bequeathed to us over the centuries by dedicated
	naturalists. Unfortunately, in this age of molecular biology and
	genetic preoccupation, the community of naturalists — or, at least,
	academically connected ones — has largely died out. It is a shame that
	biologists today can easily pass through their schooling and into a
	pristine laboratory without ever having read descriptions such as the
	following, let alone having observed and investigated these phenomena
	for themselves.  The vignettes in this article, culled from various
	sources, afford only fragmentary glimpses of the larger panorama of
	life on earth. But they are enough to remind us of the “miracle” that
	life can so easily appear to be.  The reminder is a useful one, and
	may stimulate us toward efforts of understanding that are not cramped
	by prevailing dogmas.  </description>
	<link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2018/scenes_35.htm</link>
	<guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2018/scenes_35.htm</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>inwardness
	(intention, idea, meaning)</category>
	<comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>A Physicist, a Philologist, and the Meaning of
  Life</title> <description> We have all heard about the insignificance of
  human existence in a cosmos that is indifferent, if not alien, to us.
  But history and language suggest that the cosmos has a different story
  to tell.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2018/meaning_33.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2018/meaning_33.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>inwardness
  (intention, idea, meaning)</category> <category>evolution/of
  consciousness</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Why Can’t Biologists Quit Believing in Intelligent
  Design?</title> <description> Few biologists are reticent about their
  conviction that organisms are machine-like and have been “tinkered” with
  throughout evolutionary history by a designer capable of producing
  intelligent results — all without any intelligent aid from organisms
  themselves.  The designer they have in mind, of course, is natural
  selection, which has famously been likened to a blind watchmaker and is
  almost universally referred to as an agent capable of intelligent
  activity.  Not many biologists, whether ID proponents or otherwise, seem
  particularly interested in confronting the reality of intelligent agency
  where we observe it directly — in living beings — as opposed to taking
  the organism merely as evidence for the real guiding intelligence of
  their preferred Designer. This indifference toward organisms follows
  rather naturally when you have conceived organisms as machines, which
  always require an external designer. But we will take the alternative
  path, turning toward the organism’s inherent life.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2017/id_32.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2017/id_32.htm</guid> <pubDate>Thu,
  14 Dec 2017 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>evolution/intelligent
  design</category> <category>explanation/biological</category>
  <category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <category>machine-idea</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Evolution and the Purposes of Life</title> <description>
  Does evolutionary theory explain the origin and reality of purposiveness
  in the life of organisms?  Or does the reality of purposiveness point us
  toward severe and disabling inadequacies in the reigning versions of the
  theory?  This is a large and ambitious article — the first (and more
  preparatory) part of a two-part effort to reconceptualize evolution in
  an unexpectedly fundamental way.  The second (forthcoming) part is
  tentatively entitled, “Is Directed Evolution a Necessary Assumption in
  Biology?” NOTE: the current article is a major expansion and recasting
  of an earlier article, “Can Darwinian Evolutionary Theory Be Taken
  Seriously?” It covers extensive new territory and is far more adequate
  to the topic.  Little of the earlier piece remains.  </description>
  <link>http://thenewatlantis.com/publications/evolution-and-the-purposes-of-life</link>
  <guid>http://thenewatlantis.com/publications/evolution-and-the-purposes-of-life</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>evolution</category> <category>evolution/as mindless
  process</category> <category>evolution/intelligent design</category>
  <category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <category>machine-idea</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Genes and Organisms: Improvising the Dance of Life</title>
  <description> Molecular biologists have spent several decades trying to
  identify how “one thing causing another” explains the organism. It is a
  simplistic and decontextualized way of looking that ends up in radical
  falsehood. The study of genes and their expression shows us that the
  organism is a living, intentional activity coordinating its parts in
  relation to the needs of the whole. Here I try to offer a glimpse of
  this whole at the molecular level.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/genes_29.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/genes_29.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>chromosome/chromatin</category>
  <category>chromosome/dynamics</category> <category>DNA</category>
  <category>epigenetics</category>
  <category>gene/indefinability</category> <category>gene
  regulation</category> <category>genome/organization</category>
  <category>genome/remodeling</category> <category>machine-idea</category>
  <category>plasticity</category> <category>rna</category>
  <category>transcription</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Where Do Intelligence and Wisdom Reside? (From Bodily
  Wisdom to the Knowing Self, Part 3)</title> <description> It makes
  little sense to try to explain how intelligence arises in organisms,
  given that we see nothing but intelligence there — for example, in the
  processes producing the brain.  The really interesting challenge is to
  distinguish the intelligence at work in our bodies from the intelligence
  we possess as our own conscious activity.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/bodily-wisdom3_28.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/bodily-wisdom3_28.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>explanation/biological</category> <category>inwardness
  (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>How to Unthink Epigenetics</title> <description> Confusion
  over the meaning of “epigenetics” reflects fundamental confusion about
  the nature of organisms and biological causation.  Epigenetics really
  points us to the intentional activity of the whole organism — an
  activity in which DNA is caught up.  The organism is making use of its
  DNA, not being governed by it.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/unthinking_epigenetics_27.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/unthinking_epigenetics_27.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>chromosome/chromatin</category>
  <category>DNA/noncoding</category> <category>epigenetics</category>
  <category>explanation/and causation</category>
  <category>gene/genocentrism</category> <category>gene
  regulation</category> <category>holism/contextual</category>
  <category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Symptoms: Notes from the Biological Literature (3)</title>
  <description> Both the history of research on induced pluripotency and
  the current discoveries regarding the microbiome testify to the decisive
  importance of context, relationship, and interaction in the life of the
  organism.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/lit-notes3_26.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2015/lit-notes3_26.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>development</category>
  <category>explanation/biological</category> <category>explanation/and
  causation</category> <category>holism/contextual</category>
  <category>pluripotency/induced</category> <category>explanation/part and
  whole</category> <category>microbiome</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Of Humans and Our Microbial Guests: A Dynamic and Living
  Balance </title> <description> You’ll have a hard time believing how the
  invisible microbes within us function as part of our own life.  And
  perhaps not so hard a time believing how biologists are tempted
  immediately to regard particular microorganisms as opportunities for
  exerting neat control over everything from liver cancer to autism.
  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/microbiome_25.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/microbiome_25.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>explanation/and causation</category>
  <category>explanation/biological</category> <category>explanation/part
  and whole</category> <category>holism/contextual</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>How Does an Organism Get Its Shape? The Causal Role of
  Biological Form </title> <description> A study of plant form reveals
  that organic form is a causal principle; in a very real sense, it is
  form that brings about its own physical embodiment, not physical
  interactions that bring about form.  A realization of this truth would
  radically transform biological thinking.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/brady_24.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/brady_24.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>development
  (ontogeny)</category> <category>evolution/intelligent design</category>
  <category>explanation/biological</category> <category>explanation/and
  causation</category> <category>form/organismal</category>
  <category>holism/contextual</category> <category>holism/versus mysticism
  and vitalism</category> <category> inwardness (intention, idea,
  meaning)</category> <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item> <title>Let’s Loosen Up Biological Thinking!</title> <description>
  Excerpt: “How many molecular biologists today would feel such freedom —
  the kind of freedom Richard Conn Henry knew within the physics
  community?  I mean, for example, the freedom to wonder aloud whether
  intention and agency, so difficult to banish from biological
  description, might be at least as fundamental to our understanding of
  local molecular interactions as those interactions are to our
  understanding of intention and agency.” </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/mental_cell_23.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/mental_cell_23.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>explanation/biological</category> <category>inwardness
  (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Vladimir Solovyov on Sexual Love and Evolution</title>
  <description> A late 19th-century work by the Russian philosopher,
  Vladimir Solovyov, convincingly demonstrates that "sexual love",
  culminating in human romantic love, cannot be understood merely as a
  means for propagating the species; it explains the evolutionary process
  more than being explained by it.  Solovyov’s book is a useful
  counterpoint to twenty-first century sociobiology.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/love_22.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/love_22.htm</guid> <pubDate>Fri,
  01 Aug 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>evolution/sociobiology</category> <category>explanation/part
  and whole</category> <category>inwardness (intention, idea,
  meaning)</category> <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item> <title>Symptoms: Notes from the Biological Literature (Part 2.
  The Limits of Causal Understanding)</title> <description> Contents:
  “Viruses, cytoplasmic DNA, and the web of life”; “The (molecular) days
  of our lives”; “DNA and RNA brought to life”; “Functional vs.
  nonfunctional DNA binding”.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/lit-notes2_21.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/lit-notes2_21.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>chromosome/chromatin</category> <category>DNA</category>
  <category>explanation/causation</category>
  <category>gene/genocentrism</category> <category>gene
  regulation</category> <category>machine idea</category>
  <category>plasticity/genome</category>
  <category>transcription/transcription factors</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Psyche, Soma, and the Unity of Gesture (From Bodily Wisdom
  to the Knowing Self, Part 2)</title> <description> There is no rigid,
  psyche/soma, inner/outer or mind/matter dichotomy in the human being or
  in any other organism.  There is no rigid, psyche/soma, inner/outer or
  mind/matter dichotomy in the human being or in any other organism.  From
  the body as a whole to its various parts, from the macro scale to the
  micro, from conscious activity to unconscious processes, from human
  speech to the communication of the cell, we see bodily gesturing that at
  the same time expresses an inner or psychic content — expresses, for
  example, intention and judicious choice as part of a life story.  In
  short, we see something like speech in its broadest sense — a word- or
  logos-activity.  There seems to be an unbroken continuity from the most
  intensely conscious thought and speech down to fully unconscious
  expressions.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/bodily-wisdom2_20.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/bodily-wisdom2_20.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>explanation/biological</category> <category>inwardness
  (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Three Questions for Intelligent Design Theorists</title>
  <description> When intelligent design theorists emphasize
  “machine-design” in the organism as evidence of the past activity of an
  intelligent designer, they do an injustice both to the organism and to
  their own interests.  If they want to combat the dominant materialistic
  commitments of contemporary science, they could begin by recognizing
  that the organism itself manifests, in every aspect of its life, a
  presently acting wisdom.  It does not contain machine-like devices, and
  does not require an engineer-designer who at various times in the past
  acted externally upon already given materials as human engineers do.
  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/id-questions_19.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/id-questions_19.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>evolution/intelligent design</category>
  <category>machine-idea</category> <category>inwardness (intention, idea,
  meaning)</category> <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item> <title>Biology’s Shameful Refusal to Disown the
  Machine-Organism</title> <description> The idea that the organism is a
  machine or consists of machine-like parts is a distortion of the truth
  so extreme and so contrary to what is immediately evident that we can
  only see it as a kind of collective aberration of the scientific mind
  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/machines_18.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/machines_18.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>machine-idea</category> <category>machine-idea/code</category>
  <category>form/molecular</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Symptoms: Notes from the Biological Literature (1)</title>
  <description> Hox genes, often cited as "controllers" of organismal
  form, turn out to be dependent for their expression on the various
  factors that control THEIR spatial form in the nucleus.  In a second
  paper, metabolism is proposed as a replacement for DNA at the head of
  important causal chains in the organism.  And a special issue of the
  journal “Cell” looks for the unifying threads that make sense of the
  tidal waves of isolated data available to biologists today.  Where can
  those threads be found, if not in the whole organism, as a unity, and
  not in any particular parts?  In sum, as the feverish obsession with DNA
  as First Cause continues to lose its force, we may be seeing a
  long-delayed effort to understand the whole organism.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/lit-notes1_17.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/lit-notes1_17.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>chromosome/dynamics</category>
  <category>gene/regulation</category>
  <category>form/organismal</category>
  <category>holism/contextual</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>RNA: Dancing with a thousand partners — Or, the problem of
  biological explanation</title> <description> The remarkable discovery
  and investigation of “competing endogenous RNAs”, or ceRNAs, durings the
  past three years or so illustrates the challenge of biological
  explanation.  If we are faithful to observation, we recognize that in
  the organism the larger pattern, or context, should, in the proper
  sense, be seen as the cause of the the part-processes through which the
  pattern comes to manifestation. This is the stumbling block for
  conventional scientists of a materialistic bent. Yet it turns out to be
  a truth that they implicitly accept and work with all the time.
  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/rna-partners_16.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/rna-partners_16.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>RNA</category> <category>explanation/biological</category>
  <category>explanation/part and whole</category>
  <category>form/organismal</category> <category>holism</category>
  <category>inwardness (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <category>gene regulation</category> <category>evolution/as mindless
  process</category> <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>
 
  <item> <title>Who are you and who am I and who are we?</title>
  <description> The way in which a cell’s identity depends on the
  micro-niche in which it is found raises questions of identity and
  context, organism and environment, self and world — fundamental
  questions arising throughout all of biology.  Among these questions:
  When biologists speak of the organism’s activity, who exactly do they
  mean to say is performing that activity?  When they acknowledge that
  something in the organism is context-dependent, what in fact is it
  dependent upon — what agency, or unified sphere of activity, or
  principle, or lawfulness, or other reality of any sort are they
  appealing to?  They cannot be pointing merely to a particular collection
  of objects, because the collection can be endlessly varied or perturbed,
  and yet the context remains more or less coherent, and the organism more
  or less maintains its character.  What is coherent?  What has this
  character?  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/who-are-we_15.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2014/who-are-we_15.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>explanation/part and whole</category>
  <category>holism/contextual</category> <category>plasticity</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>From bodily wisdom to the knowing self (Part 1)</title>
  <description> Organisms, from the bacterium to the human being, are, in
  one sense or another, reasoning agents; they pursue intentions and
  purposes, which may or may not be conscious. Reckoning with the
  distinction between conscious human intentions and the intentions at
  work in our bodies or in lower organisms is key to avoiding illegitimate
  use of psyche-related terms in biology.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/bodily-wisdom-to-knowing-self_14.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/bodily-wisdom-to-knowing-self_14.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>explanation/biological</category> <category>inwardness
  (intention, idea, meaning)</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>The unexpected phases of life</title> <description>
  Transitions between different phases of matter (for example, from solid
  to semi-liquid to liquid, or from liquid to gel) are now being explored
  as fundamental organizing principles of the cell and as factors in the
  regulation of gene expression.  Moreover, water, which plays a central
  role in so many phase transitions as well as in molecular binding, has
  been called a “biomolecule” — with good reason.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/phases-of-life_13.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/phases-of-life_13.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>form/molecular</category> <category>gene regulation</category>
  <category>holism/organism as a “formed stream”</category>
  <category>machine idea/code</category> <category>protein</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Why genetic synonyms are not synonymous</title>
  <description> The genetic code was supposed to carry the meaning of DNA.
  Of the many lines of emerging evidence showing that “code” is a
  misnomer, perhaps the least attention has been (at least until recently)
  been given to synonymous codons.  They were supposed to be more or less
  equivalent, but they are now testifying in a loud voice about the
  inadequacies of the code idea.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/genetic-synonyms-are-not-synonymous_12.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/genetic-synonyms-are-not-synonymous_12.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>DNA</category> <category>DNA/junk</category>
  <category>form/molecular</category> <category>gene regulation</category>
  <category>machine idea/code</category> <category>translation</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Yet another face of DNA</title> <description> Among all
  its other personas, DNA is now showing signs of being used by the
  organism as an intercellular signaling molecule.  Small DNA fragments
  can be moved from donor cells through the bloodstream and into recipient
  cells, where they can be incorporated into chromosomes and employed in
  the production of proteins — all with physiological consequences.
  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/yet-another-face-of-dna_11.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/yet-another-face-of-dna_11.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>DNA</category> <category>signaling</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>A sectarian quarrel? Intelligent design and
  neo-Darwinism</title> <description> Both the proponents of intelligent
  design and the most antagonistic conventional biologists hold a
  remarkably similar set of assumptions.  It is these that frame their
  disputes, and it is the letting go of the faulty assumptions that could
  lead to an overcoming of the disputes.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/sectarian-quarrel_10.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/sectarian-quarrel_10.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>evolution/intelligent design</category> <category>evolution/as
  mindless process</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Will the real Walter Gilbert please stand up?</title>
  <description> Human beings, it appears, often are genomic mosaics, with
  different cell populations having variously modified DNA.  And the early
  embryo is a veritable incubator of sometimes drastically modified
  genomes.  This points to yet another way the organism manages its own
  genome.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/real-walter-gilbert_9.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/real-walter-gilbert_9.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>development</category> <category>genome/remodeling</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Shattering the genome</title> <description> A one-celled
  organism that can patch back together its own genome even when it has
  been fragmented by radiation into a thousand pieces tells us a great
  deal about the functioning of living creatures in general.
  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/shattering-the-genome_8.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/shattering-the-genome_8.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>gene/genocentrism</category>
  <category>genome/remodeling</category> <category>holism</category>
  <category>machine-idea</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>A thousand-stranded tapestry: how organisms employ their
  genes</title> <description> Introduction to a collection of notes on
  gene regulation culled from the technical literature.  Warning: you may
  find their impact overwhelming.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/thousand-stranded-tapestry_7.htm</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/ar/2013/thousand-stranded-tapestry_7.htm</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>epigenetics</category> <category>gene regulation</category>
  <category>holism</category> <category>transcription</category>
  <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments> </item>
 
  <item> <title>Biology Worthy of Life: Archive</title> <description> Here
  is where you can access all previous articles from the Rediscovering
  Life service.  </description>
  <link>https://bwo.life/org/comm/news.htm#archive</link>
  <guid>https://bwo.life/org/comm/news.htm#archive</guid> <pubDate>Thu, 24
  Apr 2014 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> <category>holistic biology</category>
  <category>whole organism biology</category>
  <category>genetics</category> <category>evolution</category>
  <category>epigenetics</category> <category>gene regulation></category>
  <category>gene expression></category> <category>holism versus
  mechanism</category> <category>meaning in biology and
  evolution</category> <comments>mailto:stevet@netfuture.org</comments>
  </item>

</channel>
</rss>
